Comment by thomasahle

8 hours ago

What a weird way to write the harmonic average.

----

Write v_i = Var[X_i]. John writes

    t_i = \frac{\prod_{j\ne i} v_j}{\sum_{k=1}^n \prod_{j\ne k} v_j}.

But if you multiply top and bottom by (1 / \prod_{m=1}^n v_m), you just get

   t_i = \frac{1/v_i}{\sum_{k=1}^n 1/v_k}.

No need to compute elementary symmetric polynomials.

If you plug those optimal (t_i) back into the variance, you get

    \min Var[\sum t_i X_i] = 1/(\sum_{k=1}^n 1/v_k) = H/n,

where `H = n / (\sum_{k=1}^n 1/v_k)` is the Harmonic Mean of the variances.

Yeah and this is a much more intuitive way of generalising from the n = 2 case. Weights are proportional to inverse variance even for n > 2. Importantly this assumes independence so it doesn’t translate to portfolio optimisation very easily.

Please will the mods implement maths rendering?? If the source were made available we could do it ourselves.

  • Once you implement that we’re stuck with it forever. One could just write sum(dy/dx) and be understood in context by one who is knowledgeable enough.

  • I hope this site does not.

    ADDED. Because the new functionality will be used to create cutesy effects for reasons that have nothing to do with communicating math, increasing the demand for moderation work.

    • Why? Latex is not how maths if supposed to be read, else we'd all be doing that. It's how it might be written.

      edit: Nobody is going to use maths for cutesy effects. Where have you ever seen that happen? Downvote them if they do. It is not going to be a big deal.

  • It’s a pretty raw website. You’re better served with an extension. A friend of mine made a Chrome extension we use for block / favorite lists e.g.

    • Even if you personally had a mathjax extension, you would still be prevented from explaining math to others, unless you could convince everyone to install it.

      1 reply →

It’s much clearer when you write these problems in terms of matrix math. The minimum variance portfolio is very important in finance.

  • How would you write this with matrices? It seems like there are many ways you could generalize.