Comment by SLWW 3 months ago Yes.Only way is to secure your IoT devices/routers/cameras/etc. 7 comments SLWW Reply esafak 3 months ago Through personal responsibility? That is not scalable; look at how many compromised devices there are. We need a better solution as an industry. rollcat 3 months ago Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle. fch42 3 months ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that? 1 reply → qiqitori 3 months ago Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers. 1 reply → userbinator 3 months ago "a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom.
esafak 3 months ago Through personal responsibility? That is not scalable; look at how many compromised devices there are. We need a better solution as an industry. rollcat 3 months ago Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle. fch42 3 months ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that? 1 reply → qiqitori 3 months ago Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers. 1 reply → userbinator 3 months ago "a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom.
rollcat 3 months ago Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle. fch42 3 months ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that? 1 reply → qiqitori 3 months ago Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers. 1 reply →
fch42 3 months ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that? 1 reply →
userbinator 3 months ago "a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom.
Through personal responsibility? That is not scalable; look at how many compromised devices there are. We need a better solution as an industry.
Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle.
A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that?
1 reply →
Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers.
1 reply →
"a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"
I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom.