← Back to context Comment by SLWW 1 day ago Yes.Only way is to secure your IoT devices/routers/cameras/etc. 6 comments SLWW Reply esafak 1 day ago Through personal responsibility? That is not scalable; look at how many compromised devices there are. We need a better solution as an industry. userbinator 15 hours ago "a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom. rollcat 1 day ago Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle. fch42 7 hours ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that? qiqitori 20 hours ago Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers. 1 reply →
esafak 1 day ago Through personal responsibility? That is not scalable; look at how many compromised devices there are. We need a better solution as an industry. userbinator 15 hours ago "a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom. rollcat 1 day ago Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle. fch42 7 hours ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that? qiqitori 20 hours ago Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers. 1 reply →
userbinator 15 hours ago "a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom.
rollcat 1 day ago Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle. fch42 7 hours ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that? qiqitori 20 hours ago Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers. 1 reply →
fch42 7 hours ago A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that?
Through personal responsibility? That is not scalable; look at how many compromised devices there are. We need a better solution as an industry.
"a better solution as an industry" = "corporate authoritarianism"
I'd rather these attacks continue, than they not exist at all, because the latter is only possible in a world without any freedom.
Yep. Manufacturers / distributors should be held responsible. Aligning the incentives is half the battle.
A "do not connect to the cloud" physical flip switch on the IoT device is what I want. Where can I sign the petition for that?
Yes, need to protect Azure from those evil manufacturers.
1 reply →