Comment by pjmlp
3 months ago
Last time I checked, There is hardly anything, doesn't mean there aren't any libraries left covering.
And even so, there are .NET bindings for a few of those libraries like PyTorch, OpenCV and ONNX Runtime.
3 months ago
Last time I checked, There is hardly anything, doesn't mean there aren't any libraries left covering.
And even so, there are .NET bindings for a few of those libraries like PyTorch, OpenCV and ONNX Runtime.
You're misrepresenting reality, companies aren't choosing .NET for their AI workflows. There's nothing like ComfyUI, the ecosystems are worlds apart, it's not even close.
Your distorting my words, I haven't said anything specific about AI or world domination via NET.
Only that there are plenty of use cases coverage, moreso when willing to actually pay for tooling.
I never mentioned that .NET was on the world domination path for AI libraries.
If folks rather use an interpreted language, CPU vendors will appreciate it.
> There is hardly anything that isn't available in .NET, the main problem is being willing to pay for tooling.
Here you're saying .NET has nearly everything, you just need to pay for it sometimes.
> And even so, there are .NET bindings for a few of those libraries like PyTorch, OpenCV and ONNX Runtime.
As apparently AI is no problem for .NET either since it has some bindings. So I really didn't need to use Python if I was prepared to pay for some tools as "There is hardly anything that isn't available in .NET" - misrepresent the situation much?
As if that does anything to help the different Python packages you need. Yeah you could rewrite every Python package built on top of it, or you know, shell out to a process or API.
3 replies →