Comment by throwawaysoxjje 3 months ago I mean, you just said it was. 1 comment throwawaysoxjje Reply astrange 3 months ago It wasn't necessarily. You could redefine the "true meaning" of the training data such that it wasn't an addition operation but was actually some other one, with the same data, and then the generalization would be wrong.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
astrange 3 months ago It wasn't necessarily. You could redefine the "true meaning" of the training data such that it wasn't an addition operation but was actually some other one, with the same data, and then the generalization would be wrong.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
It wasn't necessarily. You could redefine the "true meaning" of the training data such that it wasn't an addition operation but was actually some other one, with the same data, and then the generalization would be wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem