← Back to context Comment by throwawaysoxjje 10 days ago I mean, you just said it was. 1 comment throwawaysoxjje Reply astrange 10 days ago It wasn't necessarily. You could redefine the "true meaning" of the training data such that it wasn't an addition operation but was actually some other one, with the same data, and then the generalization would be wrong.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
astrange 10 days ago It wasn't necessarily. You could redefine the "true meaning" of the training data such that it wasn't an addition operation but was actually some other one, with the same data, and then the generalization would be wrong.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem
It wasn't necessarily. You could redefine the "true meaning" of the training data such that it wasn't an addition operation but was actually some other one, with the same data, and then the generalization would be wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem