Comment by jchw
3 months ago
I don't think so: JPEG 2000, as far as I know, isn't generally supported for web use in web browsers, but it is supported in PDF.
3 months ago
I don't think so: JPEG 2000, as far as I know, isn't generally supported for web use in web browsers, but it is supported in PDF.
> I don't think so: JPEG 2000, as far as I know, isn't generally supported for web use in web browsers, but it is supported in PDF.
Safari supported JPEG 2000 since 2010 but removed support last year [1].
[1]: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178758
So Firefox (or others) can't open a pdf with a embedded jpeg-2000/XL? Or does pdf.js somehow support it?
Seems like it: https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js.openjpeg
This test renders correctly in Firefox, in any case: https://sources.debian.org/data/main/p/pdf2djvu/0.9.18.2-2/t...
Apparently I really flubbed my wording for this comment. I'm saying they do support it inside of PDF, just not elsewhere in the web platform.
JPEG-XL is recommended as the preferred format for HDR content for PDFs, so it’s more likely to be encountered:
https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/10/another_chance_for_jp...
I'm not convinced HDR PDFs will be a common thing anytime soon, even without this chicken and egg problem of support
What I mean to say is, I believe browsers do support JPEG 2000 in PDF, just not on the web.
the last time that I check it, I find that I need to convert to Jpeg to show the image in browsers.
1 reply →