Comment by emmavis

4 days ago

In simple terms for humanists, does that brings us closer in anyway to scifi engines?:)

The most realistic sci-fi engines are nuclear pulse engines where you ride the shockwaves of thousands of fusion bombs to reach a few percent of the speed of light. Those we could probably build right now if we were willing to spend the money. Replacing the fusion bombs with antimatter bombs would be a nice improvement for the basic design

Isn't it the path to a yet deadlier bomb ? #alwaysLookOnTheBrightSideOfLife

  • In all (realistic) interplanetary space travel - not to mention interstellar - the difference between the largest bomb/death ray anyone has ever experienced and a better drive, is purely a matter of where you aim it and when/how you throttle it up.

    The most hilarious part of the expanse for instance is how they didn’t really use their actual drives as weapons even in CQB, which is quite a waste!

    Not actually that different for rockets now, frankly, we just usually don’t operate direct nuclear fission/fusion drives right now for this very reason and our own sense of self preservation.

    There certainly are plans on the drawing board!

    It would take 23 grams of antimatter to produce the effect of a 1 megaton nuclear bomb, and the biggest factor stopping someone is both production of the matter itself (improving) and actual shielding technology (magnetic bottles good enough to effectively trap that much antimatter are huge and extremely energy consuming right now - much bigger than a fusion bomb of equivalent power).

    Theoretically, it should be possible to store that much in a thermos bottle, however. We just need better superconductor technology.

No. Unless you find a chunk of antimatter or a way to break the laws of physics.