Comment by wackget

4 days ago

Giving Windows 11 the highest rating and XP one of the worst ratings clearly demonstrates that this author is not a serious person.

I don't think it's meant to be taken seriously, at all. It's a pretty unserious surface level critique of past GUIs based on 2025 standards. It's a bit like ranking the Coolest Looking Batman's - there's not really an honest metric outside of ones personal favorite.

Just because you disagree , doesn’t mean that your opinion holds any weight over theirs.

Especially because you’ve provided no rebuttal of substance, and resorted to name calling.

  • Windows 11 usability is garbage compared to Windows 10. Windows 10 already had multiple desktops, docking(which does need app to augment), sandboxing, and the start menu worked. Further win 10 does not gimp the OS if not activated, doesn't require an online account, and has an identical update mechanism to win11.

    There is nothing superior or even functionally 'new' in Windows 11 besides compute burning eye candy and embedded backdoored encryption

    If Windows 7 had multi core enhancement, driver downloading, and updated libraries it would still be a superior OS from a weight of resources perspective.

    • None of your points are relevant to the article at hand which is about the visual design of the OSs.

  • What name calling? Calling the author 'an unserious person' isn't name calling. Might be worth reading the article:

    > "If you like Windows 8’s look, you are a bad person. You are the one Steve Jobs was talking about when he said Microsoft had no taste."

    yeah you don't need to read very much of this to know this author hasn't exactly written a substantive article; they certainly aren't bothering to backup their claims with any reasoning. the whole post itself is 'this version of windows was ugly, this one wasn't etc'.

  • GP has a point tho. The article ranks vista over XP, and that's just ludicrous. Even Microsoft has admitted that vista was hot garbage.

    It's even become a slang expression: a app can have a "Vista moment", meaning they released a version that was completely unusable and a stark regression from previous versions.

    Meanwhile XP is widely regarded to have been the best windows version ever. The only version that even compares in terms of popularity is 7.

    I get the feeling the author of the post hasn't actually used any of the older versions of windows, and was ranking solely based on some screenshots they found online. There's no other reasonable explanation for rating vista higher than XP.

    • Vista wasn't that bad from purely OS side. On a VM it runs pretty stable.

      However, Microsoft made a huge change to how the OS and drivers worked. If you still use Windows, you are still benefitting from some of the changes.

      However HW vendors usually ship rather broken drivers, it was doubly bad since Vista overhauled the driver interface. By the time all vendors fixed their shitty and badly tested drivers we already had 7. It is also partly Microsoft's fault since they had absolute chaos in Vista development due to shitty hacks on top of hacks that was the consumer OS (XP).

      Similarly Vista was very heavy for its contemporary average hardware. By the time HW caught up, 7 was released.

    • What does anything you just said have to do with the article though, which specifically focuses on the UI?

Is everyone who disagrees with you an unserious person, or just on this particular topic?

  • The disagreement isn't what makes him not serious; the hubris to declare Windows 11 the most usable OS does.

    No one who has any real experience with *nix, legacy ios, legacy Windows, and modern Windows/ios UI/UX would rate win11 top without serious qualifiers

    • Agreed. Something has to be wrong with you if you were to prefer Windows 11 to basically anything else. GNOME 3, Ubuntu's whatever desktop environment, KDE, Omarchy, macOS, Windows 8-10 - it's all more consistent, easier to grasp and also looks better than Windows 11.