Comment by lionkor 2 months ago also rebases instead of merges wouldn't count as merges 2 comments lionkor Reply DSpinellis 2 months ago I don't think the concept of a rebase existed before Bitbucker and Git. ahartmetz 2 months ago It wasn't called rebasing, but working on a shared branch and updating that branch while having local changes did the same thing.
DSpinellis 2 months ago I don't think the concept of a rebase existed before Bitbucker and Git. ahartmetz 2 months ago It wasn't called rebasing, but working on a shared branch and updating that branch while having local changes did the same thing.
ahartmetz 2 months ago It wasn't called rebasing, but working on a shared branch and updating that branch while having local changes did the same thing.
I don't think the concept of a rebase existed before Bitbucker and Git.
It wasn't called rebasing, but working on a shared branch and updating that branch while having local changes did the same thing.