Comment by gjvc 3 hours ago [flagged] 5 comments gjvc Reply wat10000 2 hours ago It makes it easy for me to find additional commentary for things I’m interested in, and I appreciate that. There’s no policing going on. If you find it off-putting, that’s your problem. gjvc 2 hours ago as i said and you ignored, all it does is put people off from having fresh conversations. wat10000 16 minutes ago I directly addressed that in my last sentence. macintux 35 minutes ago You do realize that dang himself frequently aggregates related discussions, and thanks people for doing so.And that the previous discussions of the same URL are readily available at the top of the topic, via the "past" link.So either HN itself is actively discouraging discussions, which seems unlikely, or your perception of this is askew.
wat10000 2 hours ago It makes it easy for me to find additional commentary for things I’m interested in, and I appreciate that. There’s no policing going on. If you find it off-putting, that’s your problem. gjvc 2 hours ago as i said and you ignored, all it does is put people off from having fresh conversations. wat10000 16 minutes ago I directly addressed that in my last sentence. macintux 35 minutes ago You do realize that dang himself frequently aggregates related discussions, and thanks people for doing so.And that the previous discussions of the same URL are readily available at the top of the topic, via the "past" link.So either HN itself is actively discouraging discussions, which seems unlikely, or your perception of this is askew.
gjvc 2 hours ago as i said and you ignored, all it does is put people off from having fresh conversations. wat10000 16 minutes ago I directly addressed that in my last sentence. macintux 35 minutes ago You do realize that dang himself frequently aggregates related discussions, and thanks people for doing so.And that the previous discussions of the same URL are readily available at the top of the topic, via the "past" link.So either HN itself is actively discouraging discussions, which seems unlikely, or your perception of this is askew.
macintux 35 minutes ago You do realize that dang himself frequently aggregates related discussions, and thanks people for doing so.And that the previous discussions of the same URL are readily available at the top of the topic, via the "past" link.So either HN itself is actively discouraging discussions, which seems unlikely, or your perception of this is askew.
It makes it easy for me to find additional commentary for things I’m interested in, and I appreciate that. There’s no policing going on. If you find it off-putting, that’s your problem.
as i said and you ignored, all it does is put people off from having fresh conversations.
I directly addressed that in my last sentence.
You do realize that dang himself frequently aggregates related discussions, and thanks people for doing so.
And that the previous discussions of the same URL are readily available at the top of the topic, via the "past" link.
So either HN itself is actively discouraging discussions, which seems unlikely, or your perception of this is askew.