Tell HN: Want a better HN? Visit /newest

2 months ago

Most good posts die in /newest, buried under low-quality submissions.

HN depends on people visiting /newest and upvoting or flagging what they see.

A few minutes there each day probably does more for HN than commenting.

It’s anonymous, thankless work, like Reddit’s old “Knights of New,” but it makes a difference.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newest

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I like /active personally which will show controversial topics.

https://news.ycombinator.com/active

  • I think a list of active topics where the overall comment's upvote/downvote ratio is high, would help to avoid political, ideological, and rage posts; for those times where you just want to browse fun topics like labyrinth algorithms.

    Despite that, /active is not that bad for that.

I kind of enjoy /newest. Yes, the it has more noise, but sometimes you can get random interesting things without filtered by that HN bias. I do like that bias overall, but sometimes fresh unfiltered air is nice thing to have.

  • I second this. Sometimes people post off-the-wall interesting things that don't suit Hacker News. Even the dead and flagged links can sometimes be interesting, although 99% of the time I agree with the dead and flagged status. But that one percent can be good in another context.

If we all rely on others to skim /newest, the whole curation system collapses. Maybe the homepage should surface a couple random fresh posts too?

  • We tried that once and it failed, because the median random submission is so much lower-quality than the rest of the frontpage. People reacted much as they would to finding kitchen compost in their breakfast cereal.

    • I definitely think this is a good idea for a new social platform, though. Probably the key is setting expectations correctly.

      I do wonder if a new post quarantine box on the front page, marked as such, would do better than just mixing them in.

  • I remember this being discussed a while ago and I proposed a box at the bottom with a few pseudo-random /newest links. Bu someone raised issues with the idea.

  • This is what worries me. If too many people read these pages the mods might think it undermines the quality of the community and discourse and just remove them. There is only one acceptable way of using HN, and it's in the service of maximizing civil, intellectually curious technical conversation, and suppressing everything else.

I consider it a duty to periodically check new, sample some articles, and upvote or flag if appropriate. Once a day, once every few days etc; a few articles each time.

Totally agree on this although I have to confess that I don't visit /newest frequently, this is a nice reminder!

Fortunately, the HN system has that feature called pool or second chance (https://news.ycombinator.com/pool) where mods periodically check then pick interesting submissions that were overlooked when posted and put them in the second half of the front page and see if the community finds them interesting. This happened to many of my submissions that I was surprised to see trending, sometimes after three days of submission where I totally forgot about them.

There's also /classic, which only counts votes from user accounts created before a certain cutoff date.

The cutoff used to be early 2008, I believe, but that may have changed in the last ~17 years :)

Let's divide-and-conquer! -- like all good CS algorithms do. /newest is very noisy but if you subscribe to just a "sliver" that you are interested in and review those submissions, then we can improve voting together very effectively. Personally I'm interested in robotics, so I just use this in my RSS reader and literally look at every submission (because it's not too much): https://hnrss.org/newest?q=robot%20OR%20robotics%20OR%20robo...

"most good posts" don't die in newest, otherwise HN wouldn't be functioning/popular. Almost all of the top-top posts (save a few dupes) are fresh, original content that's popular with readers and/or generating lots of discussion. C'mon now. If anything, use /newest to see the actual mire of low-quality submissions and keep them there.

It seems to me that unless you already have some social following and promote your HN submission there it’s impossible to get to the front page. No matter how good your submission is.

I posted (subjectively) high quality stuff about longevity tools that had a potential to be on front page, but the /newest just grows go so fast that no one will notice it.

I asked Gemini to make me HN-reader that show only [flagged]-messages, because when somebody was triggered that much, it must be something interesting.

Found out that they have devious schema to keep those hidden from anonymous visitor. And if you do this on a registered account, they block such perverts right away, said Gemini.

  • Did Gemini not tell you about the showdead feature in your profile?

    • That is not the point.

      I wanted only [flagged]-content.

      You can get all stuff in JSON-format, but [flagged]-content is elsewhere available only to registered users.

I've noticed occasionally a new post will show up in my homepage, which I've interpreted as being a randomized injection of new stuff to see if it gets traction. If that's true (and this is all speculation on my part), it's not strictly necessary for anyone to visit /newest.

There is a link to this: just click on "new" in the banner bar, right next to "Hacker News".

By saying that it feed is better you are saying that the mechanisms which promote stories, and other mechanisms like moderation, make HackerNews worse.

I'm looking for a simple dark mode reader/frontend, but similar in the current HN style and adapted for mobile view (adjusted font size) for late night bed scrolling.

No apps however.

> 'Most good posts die in /newest, buried under low-quality submissions.'

If the system doesnt work why advocate for it? We are a technical people, dont we have a technical solution?

I’m grateful for those who do visit /newest because it’s a cesspit of spam and uninteresting links that, justifiably, never make their way to the home page.

/active, on the other hand, is the real insiders tip. It shows the most active submissions, irrespective of whether they’ve been flagged off the homepage by users who want to avoid “controversial” topics or by an algorithm trying to avoid the same.

You don’t want it to replace the homepage as the arguing will drive you mad over time but it’s worth checking in with to see what conversation is being hidden from you.

https://news.ycombinator.com/active

Better HN?

Everytime i open /newest there's a lot of trash that hasn't been downvoted or flagged to oblivion yet.

Not sure it's that better.

  • Can you see why viewing "new" might be a good idea for overall site health, with this point in mind? What actions could you take to help with this?

fact is, this one made its way from /newest to "/".

And yet, indeed, it is up to us to weigh in for better content.