Comment by philjohn
2 months ago
Seeing as the investigation was by the ICO instead of OFCOM, yes, very much so. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
2 months ago
Seeing as the investigation was by the ICO instead of OFCOM, yes, very much so. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
That makes no difference. "Data protection" or not, it was pressure for age verification.
Can you please provide a source for your claim?
No, it doesn't need a source. It's not mysterious. To meet the demand, age verification would be necessary. What's your claim?
I guess you could be saying that the regulators were carrying out legal duties like blind automatons, without giving a thought to the way their requirements would have to be met.
1 reply →