That’s a bold claim. Are you saying that LMDB outperforms every other database on the same hardware, regardless of access pattern? And if so, is there proof of this?
Since the first question of my two-part inquiry not explicitly answered in the affirmative: To be absolutely clear, you are claiming, in writing, that LMDB outperforms every other database there is, regardless of access pattern, using the same hardware?
That’s a bold claim. Are you saying that LMDB outperforms every other database on the same hardware, regardless of access pattern? And if so, is there proof of this?
Plenty of proof. http://www.lmdb.tech/bench/
You don't have to take my word for it. Plenty of other developers know. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfiQ0h4bGWM
Since the first question of my two-part inquiry not explicitly answered in the affirmative: To be absolutely clear, you are claiming, in writing, that LMDB outperforms every other database there is, regardless of access pattern, using the same hardware?
1 reply →