Comment by CrossVR

2 months ago

I believed in the lab leak theory so for me getting the vaccine was a no brainer. I could get infected by one of two things developed in a lab, only one of which had clinical trails on humans. I went with the clinically tested option.

perfectly understandable and you’ve described a reasonable decision-making process

any reasonable person should be able to recognize that the alternative hypothesis was not an equally accepted decision

many people chose severe penalties rather than participate in a sudden worldwide field trial of mRNA vaccination by indemnified pharmaceutical companies, and in some parts of the world were not even given that choice.

  • We were also subjected to a sudden worldwide field trial of a novel coronavirus, so it makes sense that it requires a similar response to combat it. I think in any other decade this would've been celebrated as a major scientific achievement.

    If the moon landing happened today people would just be cynical about it just being an arms race with the Soviet Union to develop better ICBMs. This is of course true, but it doesn't make the achievement any less impressive.

    • this doesn’t address my point

      again, it is perfectly valid to use this line of reasoning

      but we aren’t acknowledging that the alternative hypothesis was not at all tolerated and was heavily penalized for a great many people