Comment by _zoltan_

24 days ago

what's the opposite problem statement?

People overly beholden to tried and true 'known' way of addressing a problem space and not considering/belittling alternatives. Many of the things that have been most aggressively 'bitter lesson'ed in the last decade fall into this category.

  • Like this bug report?

    The things that have been "disrupted" haven't delivered - Blockchains are still a scam, Food delivery services are worse than before (Restaurants are worse off, the people making the deliveries are worse off), Taxis still needed to go back and vet drivers to ensure that they weren't fiends.

    • > Blockchains are still a scam

      Did you actually look at the blockchain nodes implementation as of 2025 and what's in the roadmap? Ethereum nodes/L2s with optimistic or zk-proofs are probably the most advanced distributed databases that actually work.

      (not talking about "coins" and stuff obviously, another debate)

      8 replies →

    • idk, sounds like you're ignoring tried and true microeconomic theoretical principles about consumer surplus. better get back to the books before commenting

The ivory tower standing in the way of delivering value I think.

  • To be more specific, goals of perfection where perfection does not at all matter.

    • What does bothering to read some distributed systems literature have to do with demanding unnecessary perfection? Did NATS have in their docs that JetStream accepted split brain conditions as a reality, or that metadata corruption could silently delete a topic? You could maybe argue the fsync default was a tradeoff, though I think it’s a bad one (not the existence of the flag, just the default being “false”). The rest are not the kind of bugs you expect to see in a 5 year old persistence layer.

      1 reply →