>For nearly all cases, Django’s built-in template language is perfectly adequate. However, if the bottlenecks in your Django project seem to lie in the template system and you have exhausted other opportunities to remedy this, a third-party alternative may be the answer.
>Jinja2 can offer performance improvements, particularly when it comes to speed.
It's had includes and custom template tags for over a decade. Partials are a slightly nicer design for a subset of that pattern.
Wouldn’t Jinja2 macros count?
I stayed away from Jinja2 ... was under the impression it has lower performance. But I could have been wrong all these years.
>For nearly all cases, Django’s built-in template language is perfectly adequate. However, if the bottlenecks in your Django project seem to lie in the template system and you have exhausted other opportunities to remedy this, a third-party alternative may be the answer.
>Jinja2 can offer performance improvements, particularly when it comes to speed.
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/6.0/topics/performance/#al...