Comment by wat10000 2 months ago Most of the world uses other languages because they’re easier, not because they’re safer. 2 comments wat10000 Reply gpm 2 months ago They're easier because, amongst other improvements, they are safer. wat10000 2 months ago Sure, my point is the safety is not why they originally supplanted C and C++. It was seen largely as a tradeoff between ease of development and runtime performance. Memory safety as a goal of its own didn’t become prominent until much later.
gpm 2 months ago They're easier because, amongst other improvements, they are safer. wat10000 2 months ago Sure, my point is the safety is not why they originally supplanted C and C++. It was seen largely as a tradeoff between ease of development and runtime performance. Memory safety as a goal of its own didn’t become prominent until much later.
wat10000 2 months ago Sure, my point is the safety is not why they originally supplanted C and C++. It was seen largely as a tradeoff between ease of development and runtime performance. Memory safety as a goal of its own didn’t become prominent until much later.
They're easier because, amongst other improvements, they are safer.
Sure, my point is the safety is not why they originally supplanted C and C++. It was seen largely as a tradeoff between ease of development and runtime performance. Memory safety as a goal of its own didn’t become prominent until much later.