Comment by silisili 6 hours ago It's late, but I'm having a hell of a time parsing this. Could you explain what you meant? 2 comments silisili Reply javawizard 6 hours ago I think they read the title but not the article and assumed Rust was being removed, and (rightfully, if that were true) opined that that was a shortsighted decision.(Of course, that's not what's happening at all.) silisili 6 hours ago Ah! I hadn't considered that, thanks. That makes way more sense - having read the article I couldn't figure out what was being said here otherwise.
javawizard 6 hours ago I think they read the title but not the article and assumed Rust was being removed, and (rightfully, if that were true) opined that that was a shortsighted decision.(Of course, that's not what's happening at all.) silisili 6 hours ago Ah! I hadn't considered that, thanks. That makes way more sense - having read the article I couldn't figure out what was being said here otherwise.
silisili 6 hours ago Ah! I hadn't considered that, thanks. That makes way more sense - having read the article I couldn't figure out what was being said here otherwise.
I think they read the title but not the article and assumed Rust was being removed, and (rightfully, if that were true) opined that that was a shortsighted decision.
(Of course, that's not what's happening at all.)
Ah! I hadn't considered that, thanks. That makes way more sense - having read the article I couldn't figure out what was being said here otherwise.