Comment by jjk166 5 days ago Would that be "Do all evil" or "Do exclusively evil" or "Do no good"? 6 comments jjk166 Reply gs17 5 days ago There's also the option of "Do Some Evil". usgroup 5 days ago evil(x) -> not(do(x)) which equates to not(evil(x)) or not(do(x)).The negation would be evil(x) and do(x) by DeMorgan's law.If what you mean is all(x), evil(x) -> not(do(x))then the negation would be exists(x), evil(x) and do(x). asadm 5 days ago Do Evil, Yes! toomanyrichies 5 days ago Was this by chance a "No, money down!" Simpsons reference?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yuL6PcgSgM asadm 4 days ago it is now lol
usgroup 5 days ago evil(x) -> not(do(x)) which equates to not(evil(x)) or not(do(x)).The negation would be evil(x) and do(x) by DeMorgan's law.If what you mean is all(x), evil(x) -> not(do(x))then the negation would be exists(x), evil(x) and do(x).
asadm 5 days ago Do Evil, Yes! toomanyrichies 5 days ago Was this by chance a "No, money down!" Simpsons reference?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yuL6PcgSgM asadm 4 days ago it is now lol
toomanyrichies 5 days ago Was this by chance a "No, money down!" Simpsons reference?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yuL6PcgSgM asadm 4 days ago it is now lol
There's also the option of "Do Some Evil".
evil(x) -> not(do(x)) which equates to not(evil(x)) or not(do(x)).
The negation would be evil(x) and do(x) by DeMorgan's law.
If what you mean is all(x), evil(x) -> not(do(x))
then the negation would be exists(x), evil(x) and do(x).
Do Evil, Yes!
Was this by chance a "No, money down!" Simpsons reference?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yuL6PcgSgM
it is now lol