Comment by shadowgovt
16 days ago
It costs $40 for a 2-year-old game because the market is bearing $40 for a 2-year-old game.
If anything, it's a testament to how good a job they've done making the game.
16 days ago
It costs $40 for a 2-year-old game because the market is bearing $40 for a 2-year-old game.
If anything, it's a testament to how good a job they've done making the game.
The most recent Battlefield released at $80. Arc Raiders released at $40 with a $20 deluxe edition upgrade. I think $40 for a game like Helldivers 2 is totally fair. It's a fun game, worth at least 4 to 8 hours of playtime.
> worth at least 4 to 8 hours of playtime.
Is that supposed to be praise?
It's a comment about cost-to-hourly-entertainment. eg: if in the general sense you're spending $5-$10 per hour of entertainment you're doing at least OK. I understand that a lot of books and video games can far exceed this, but it's just a general metric and a bit of a low bar to clear. (I have a LOT more hours into the game so from my perspective my $40 has paid quite well.)
Ah sorry, I thought "at least" would carry this statement. I've played Helldivers for more than 250 hours personally.
For some reason, though, I tend to compare everything to movie theater tickets. In my head (though it's not true anymore), a movie ticket costs $8 and gives me 1 hour of entertainment. Thus anything that gives me more than 1 hour per $8 is a good deal.
$40 / 4 => $10/hr
$40 / 8 => $5/hr
Thus, I think Helldivers is a good deal for entertainment even if you only play it for under 10 hours.
1 reply →
I'm not sure what that is supposed to be - it's an online co op game, not a story-driven one like the 4-6 hour FPS games that was a norm at one point.
It's the kind of game where some people spend thousands of hours in, well worth the $40 to them.
Its also wrong. With 10 hours of helldivers 2 you havent seen much of the game at all.
I played it a bit after release and have 230 hours. I liked the game and it was worth my money.
2 replies →