Comment by 7e 2 months ago If there were TCO advantages with this setup, CUDA would not be a blocker. 3 comments 7e Reply bigyabai 2 months ago CUDA's just one example; there's a lot of hardware support on the BSDs that Apple doesn't want to inherit. ngcc_hk 2 months ago Why maint other and have baggage ? bigyabai 2 months ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
bigyabai 2 months ago CUDA's just one example; there's a lot of hardware support on the BSDs that Apple doesn't want to inherit. ngcc_hk 2 months ago Why maint other and have baggage ? bigyabai 2 months ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
ngcc_hk 2 months ago Why maint other and have baggage ? bigyabai 2 months ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
bigyabai 2 months ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
CUDA's just one example; there's a lot of hardware support on the BSDs that Apple doesn't want to inherit.
Why maint other and have baggage ?
Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.