← Back to context Comment by 7e 12 days ago If there were TCO advantages with this setup, CUDA would not be a blocker. 3 comments 7e Reply bigyabai 12 days ago CUDA's just one example; there's a lot of hardware support on the BSDs that Apple doesn't want to inherit. ngcc_hk 12 days ago Why maint other and have baggage ? bigyabai 11 days ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
bigyabai 12 days ago CUDA's just one example; there's a lot of hardware support on the BSDs that Apple doesn't want to inherit. ngcc_hk 12 days ago Why maint other and have baggage ? bigyabai 11 days ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
ngcc_hk 12 days ago Why maint other and have baggage ? bigyabai 11 days ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
bigyabai 11 days ago Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.
CUDA's just one example; there's a lot of hardware support on the BSDs that Apple doesn't want to inherit.
Why maint other and have baggage ?
Because Apple already does...? There's still PowerPC and MIPS code that runs in macOS. Asking for CUDA compatibility is not somehow too hard for the trillion-dollar megacorp to handle.