Comment by wannadingo 1 year ago Because showing that the mitigation is unreasonable highlights how unreasonable the problem is. 2 comments wannadingo Reply avazhi 1 year ago The original commenter said he always suggests people do these things. 2muchcoffeeman 1 year ago Yes, this is what they think is required to be safe. It’s up to you what you do. But what’s better having information or not having information?At the very least “civilians” need to be informed, and warned.
avazhi 1 year ago The original commenter said he always suggests people do these things. 2muchcoffeeman 1 year ago Yes, this is what they think is required to be safe. It’s up to you what you do. But what’s better having information or not having information?At the very least “civilians” need to be informed, and warned.
2muchcoffeeman 1 year ago Yes, this is what they think is required to be safe. It’s up to you what you do. But what’s better having information or not having information?At the very least “civilians” need to be informed, and warned.
The original commenter said he always suggests people do these things.
Yes, this is what they think is required to be safe. It’s up to you what you do. But what’s better having information or not having information?
At the very least “civilians” need to be informed, and warned.