Comment by sotrusting 2 months ago Right, so totally cool to ignore the law but our TOS is a binding contract. 9 comments sotrusting Reply mc32 2 months ago Yes, they can be sued for breach of contract. And it’s not a regular ToS but a signed MSA and other legally binding documents. blibble 2 months ago the license on my open source code is a contract, and they ignored thatif they can get away with it (say by claiming it's "fair use"), they'll ignore corporate ones too LPisGood 2 months ago If I were to go out on a limb, those companies spend more on tech companies than you and they have larger legal teams than you. That is a carrot and a stick for AI companies to follow the contract. 1 reply → protocolture 2 months ago Where are they ignoring the law? sotrusting 2 months ago https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/musks-xai-opera... protocolture 2 months ago Thats an allegation. Doesnt an allegation need to be tested? yieldcrv 2 months ago people that say this tend to have a misinterpretation of copyright, and use all the court cases brought by large rights holders as validationdespite all 3 branches of the government disagreeing with them over and over again sotrusting 2 months ago [flagged]
mc32 2 months ago Yes, they can be sued for breach of contract. And it’s not a regular ToS but a signed MSA and other legally binding documents. blibble 2 months ago the license on my open source code is a contract, and they ignored thatif they can get away with it (say by claiming it's "fair use"), they'll ignore corporate ones too LPisGood 2 months ago If I were to go out on a limb, those companies spend more on tech companies than you and they have larger legal teams than you. That is a carrot and a stick for AI companies to follow the contract. 1 reply →
blibble 2 months ago the license on my open source code is a contract, and they ignored thatif they can get away with it (say by claiming it's "fair use"), they'll ignore corporate ones too LPisGood 2 months ago If I were to go out on a limb, those companies spend more on tech companies than you and they have larger legal teams than you. That is a carrot and a stick for AI companies to follow the contract. 1 reply →
LPisGood 2 months ago If I were to go out on a limb, those companies spend more on tech companies than you and they have larger legal teams than you. That is a carrot and a stick for AI companies to follow the contract. 1 reply →
protocolture 2 months ago Where are they ignoring the law? sotrusting 2 months ago https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/musks-xai-opera... protocolture 2 months ago Thats an allegation. Doesnt an allegation need to be tested? yieldcrv 2 months ago people that say this tend to have a misinterpretation of copyright, and use all the court cases brought by large rights holders as validationdespite all 3 branches of the government disagreeing with them over and over again sotrusting 2 months ago [flagged]
sotrusting 2 months ago https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/musks-xai-opera... protocolture 2 months ago Thats an allegation. Doesnt an allegation need to be tested?
yieldcrv 2 months ago people that say this tend to have a misinterpretation of copyright, and use all the court cases brought by large rights holders as validationdespite all 3 branches of the government disagreeing with them over and over again sotrusting 2 months ago [flagged]
Yes, they can be sued for breach of contract. And it’s not a regular ToS but a signed MSA and other legally binding documents.
the license on my open source code is a contract, and they ignored that
if they can get away with it (say by claiming it's "fair use"), they'll ignore corporate ones too
If I were to go out on a limb, those companies spend more on tech companies than you and they have larger legal teams than you. That is a carrot and a stick for AI companies to follow the contract.
1 reply →
Where are they ignoring the law?
https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/musks-xai-opera...
Thats an allegation. Doesnt an allegation need to be tested?
people that say this tend to have a misinterpretation of copyright, and use all the court cases brought by large rights holders as validation
despite all 3 branches of the government disagreeing with them over and over again
[flagged]