Comment by the_snooze
2 days ago
That's an incomplete view. Office is a strong incumbent not because it's a good product, but because there's decades of processes built around it. To take a small slice from my world, if you do any kind of government-funded research, you must use Microsoft Office because government funding agencies have in-house templates for budgets and technical reports. They'll reject proposals and contractually-obligated deliveries if you don't use their template. Those templates break in spectacular and unpredictable ways on non-MS-Office suites.
People use MS Office because other people use MS Office. It's network effects.
That's not Microsoft's problem; Microsoft isn't broadly writing legislation that compels the use of `.docx` format and PDFs are a thing.
I never said it was Microsoft's problem. I'm just showing you that "oh, switch to something else" is a naive view if you actually have real work to do.
That's fine, but that doesn't meet the definition for a monopoly; that's just inertia.
4 replies →
Someones template breaking is not a real problem. The office alternatives work perfectly fine for "real work". If your template doesnt work fix it. You fixed it all those times it broke on office.
None of that really matters when we are assessing whether something is a monopoly or not.
Well, I don't know how you define it, but here's Wiki's first paragraph[0]:
And Merriam Webster[1]
Do these hold true for Office? Azure? VS Code? Teams? Windows?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monopoly
2 replies →