Comment by the_snooze
2 days ago
That's an incomplete view. Office is a strong incumbent not because it's a good product, but because there's decades of processes built around it. To take a small slice from my world, if you do any kind of government-funded research, you must use Microsoft Office because government funding agencies have in-house templates for budgets and technical reports. They'll reject proposals and contractually-obligated deliveries if you don't use their template. Those templates break in spectacular and unpredictable ways on non-MS-Office suites.
People use MS Office because other people use MS Office. It's network effects.
That's not Microsoft's problem; Microsoft isn't broadly writing legislation that compels the use of `.docx` format and PDFs are a thing.
None of that really matters when we are assessing whether something is a monopoly or not.
Well, I don't know how you define it, but here's Wiki's first paragraph[0]:
And Merriam Webster[1]
Do these hold true for Office? Azure? VS Code? Teams? Windows?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monopoly
2 replies →
I never said it was Microsoft's problem. I'm just showing you that "oh, switch to something else" is a naive view if you actually have real work to do.
That's fine, but that doesn't meet the definition for a monopoly; that's just inertia.
4 replies →
Someones template breaking is not a real problem. The office alternatives work perfectly fine for "real work". If your template doesnt work fix it. You fixed it all those times it broke on office.