Comment by charcircuit 2 months ago [flagged] 5 comments charcircuit Reply LtWorf 2 months ago It is true. It was written to run on 386 when all the other unix os required way more expensive machines that nobody could afford. charcircuit 2 months ago And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes. LtWorf 2 months ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
LtWorf 2 months ago It is true. It was written to run on 386 when all the other unix os required way more expensive machines that nobody could afford. charcircuit 2 months ago And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes. LtWorf 2 months ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
charcircuit 2 months ago And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes. LtWorf 2 months ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
LtWorf 2 months ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
It is true. It was written to run on 386 when all the other unix os required way more expensive machines that nobody could afford.
And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes.
Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine?
2 replies →