Comment by charcircuit 3 days ago [flagged] 5 comments charcircuit Reply LtWorf 3 days ago It is true. It was written to run on 386 when all the other unix os required way more expensive machines that nobody could afford. charcircuit 3 days ago And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes. LtWorf 3 days ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
LtWorf 3 days ago It is true. It was written to run on 386 when all the other unix os required way more expensive machines that nobody could afford. charcircuit 3 days ago And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes. LtWorf 3 days ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
charcircuit 3 days ago And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes. LtWorf 3 days ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
LtWorf 3 days ago Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine? 2 replies →
It is true. It was written to run on 386 when all the other unix os required way more expensive machines that nobody could afford.
And Windows was written for the 8086. By that logic, Windows was designed for even weaker potatoes.
Except linux still runs on 486 but windows requires a 5 year old machine?
2 replies →