← Back to context

Comment by JumpCrisscross

2 days ago

> The concept that living in a hegemony is acceptable is incoherent

Wishing upon a star that humans were better is not a solution.

Revoking the Pax Americana frees America to pursue more wars of conquest. Not fewer. It's a revocation of the rules-based international order that America (and the former Soviet Union) put in place following WWII.

It similarly frees every other wannabe global and regional hegemony to assert their spheres of influence.

7 comments

JumpCrisscross

Reply
AndrewKemendo  1 day ago

Humans rejected that and now we’re headed into a global ochlocracy

Hope you folks are ready (you’re not)

  • JumpCrisscross  1 day ago

    > Hope you folks are ready (you’re not)

    I'm American. Why would the largest military on the planet not be ready for rule by might? Revoking Pax Americana (and the rules-based international order it was built on, aspirational as it may have often been) just means our elites can go back to 19th-century rules.

    • ben_w  1 day ago

      > I'm American. Why would the largest military on the planet not be ready for rule by might?

      Two years ago, I would have agreed.

      Today? Given what Trump is doing? Kicking out military personal for being trans, his poor choice for (not only but in this topic specifically) Defence Secretary, his demand to redesign stealth warships because he won't accept the un-"aesthetic" look is driven by functional requirements, demanding a return of battleships this time with a railgun (to go with the lasers)?

      I think there's a very real risk of the USA military rapidly following the same path as post-soviet Russian military.

      Well, I say "risk": I'm European, so for me it's a good thing if the person who is trying to break up my home is more interested in flashy demos than functional weapons.

      1 reply →