> I mean, I can buy opensource.co.net but that doesn't mean I can tell you how you can use the term.
> Need more of a citation to understand that..?
This nonsense is not at all relevant to the claim for which I asked for a citation: "No, the original definition of open-source is source code that is visible (open) to the public."
> I mean, I can buy opensource.co.net but that doesn't mean I can tell you how you can use the term.
> Need more of a citation to understand that..?
This nonsense is not at all relevant to the claim for which I asked for a citation: "No, the original definition of open-source is source code that is visible (open) to the public."
No support for that claim has ever been offered.
I mean, I can buy opensource.co.net but that doesn't mean I can tell you how you can use the term.
Need more of a citation to understand that..?