Comment by seg_lol 2 months ago The mal-redacted file actually points to a crime itself of redacting things it shouldn't have. 2 comments seg_lol Reply fwip 2 months ago Or, if there is indeed an ongoing investigation on those two, it could be leaking that fact, right? seg_lol 2 months ago Not in this case, this is just a cover for the guilty because this shows that Epsteins Estate also works for Trump. The rot runs deep. There is no investigation, that is the point.
fwip 2 months ago Or, if there is indeed an ongoing investigation on those two, it could be leaking that fact, right? seg_lol 2 months ago Not in this case, this is just a cover for the guilty because this shows that Epsteins Estate also works for Trump. The rot runs deep. There is no investigation, that is the point.
seg_lol 2 months ago Not in this case, this is just a cover for the guilty because this shows that Epsteins Estate also works for Trump. The rot runs deep. There is no investigation, that is the point.
Or, if there is indeed an ongoing investigation on those two, it could be leaking that fact, right?
Not in this case, this is just a cover for the guilty because this shows that Epsteins Estate also works for Trump. The rot runs deep. There is no investigation, that is the point.