Comment by M95D
2 months ago
A politician can't be investigated or prosecuted for doing his/her job, no matter how badly incompetent or evil it is. If a judge would have the power to do that, then it indirectly gains the legislative power which breaks the separation of pwers.
A politician can be held accountable of they break the law.
This should be obvious to anyone, otherwise actual corruption would be legal - not just the similie of lobbying which does effectively the same, but skirts the actual legality by not promising anything for the money received
What I obviously said was make voting for anything clearly incompatible with the foundational laws to be illegal, just like actual corruption already is. Hence no, it would not be in violation and I continue to be surprised you're unironically of this opinion
Changing or repealing the law is against the law by definition. It would be a catch-22 to change any law if it became illegal to vote against it.
Your ignorance blows my mind
"Changing or repealing the law is against the law by definition"
What do you think an "amendment" is?
literally, the definition.
I don't think I've ever interacted with someone that had a more severe case of the dunning Kruger syndrome then you.