Comment by DetectDefect

2 months ago

You cannot treat a commodified individual "better" - it is only possible to euphemize such a logical fallacy.

So there's no point in pushing for pasture raised, and it's either all or nothing ?

I think incremental progress is possible. I think rolling back and gag laws would make a positive difference in animal welfare because people would be able to film and show how bad conditions are inside.

I think that's worth pushing for. And it's more realistic than everyone stopping eating meat all at once.

  • The economics of what you describe are impossible. The entire concept of an idyllic pasture is actual industry propaganda which is not based in objective reality.

    • I think getting everyone around me to stop eating meat is not based in objective reality.

      If we had better animal welfare laws and meat became prohibitively expensive, I would be absolutely fine with that.

      I think incremental progress is possible. We shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of good.

      3 replies →