Comment by DetectDefect 11 hours ago Such innocent mistakes make me smile these days because it gives assurance a real human wrote them. 9 comments DetectDefect Reply lithocarpus 10 hours ago Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing. BoxOfRain 6 hours ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM. bgbntty2 10 hours ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 10 hours ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 9 hours ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply → antonvs 4 hours ago *typosOh you got me cyberax 10 hours ago Unless it's an LLM instructed to make occasional mistakes.
lithocarpus 10 hours ago Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing. BoxOfRain 6 hours ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM. bgbntty2 10 hours ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 10 hours ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 9 hours ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply → antonvs 4 hours ago *typosOh you got me
BoxOfRain 6 hours ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM.
bgbntty2 10 hours ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 10 hours ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 9 hours ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply →
Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing.
Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM.
It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now.
That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!!
1 reply →
Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally?
1 reply →
*typos
Oh you got me
Unless it's an LLM instructed to make occasional mistakes.