Comment by DetectDefect 1 month ago Such innocent mistakes make me smile these days because it gives assurance a real human wrote them. 9 comments DetectDefect Reply lithocarpus 1 month ago Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing. bgbntty2 1 month ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 1 month ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 1 month ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply → BoxOfRain 1 month ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM. antonvs 1 month ago *typosOh you got me cyberax 1 month ago Unless it's an LLM instructed to make occasional mistakes.
lithocarpus 1 month ago Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing. bgbntty2 1 month ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 1 month ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 1 month ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply → BoxOfRain 1 month ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM. antonvs 1 month ago *typosOh you got me
bgbntty2 1 month ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 1 month ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 1 month ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply →
BoxOfRain 1 month ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM.
Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing.
It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now.
That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!!
1 reply →
Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally?
1 reply →
Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM.
*typos
Oh you got me
Unless it's an LLM instructed to make occasional mistakes.