← Back to context Comment by DetectDefect 2 months ago Such innocent mistakes make me smile these days because it gives assurance a real human wrote them. 9 comments DetectDefect Reply lithocarpus 2 months ago Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing. bgbntty2 2 months ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 2 months ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 2 months ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply → BoxOfRain 2 months ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM. antonvs 2 months ago *typosOh you got me cyberax 2 months ago Unless it's an LLM instructed to make occasional mistakes.
lithocarpus 2 months ago Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing. bgbntty2 2 months ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 2 months ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 2 months ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply → BoxOfRain 2 months ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM. antonvs 2 months ago *typosOh you got me
bgbntty2 2 months ago It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now. jondwillis 2 months ago That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!! 1 reply → fortran77 2 months ago Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally? 1 reply →
BoxOfRain 2 months ago Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM.
Don't worry sufficiently advanced LLMs will learn how to put in the right amount of typoes to be convincing.
It's not certain that LLMs don't do this already—it's likely their doing this even now.
That’s —— not just —— possible— it’s —— ——— probable!!!
1 reply →
Are you an LLM that misspelled “they’re” intentionally?
1 reply →
Swearing is a good heuristic still I think. The American corporate world remains rather prissy about swearing, so if the post sounds like a hairy docker after 12 pints then it's probably not an LLM.
*typos
Oh you got me
Unless it's an LLM instructed to make occasional mistakes.