Comment by WarOnPrivacy
1 month ago
When content is untruthful as delivered, whatever truth it contains is of the lowest possible value. In this place, we are merely picking bones from garbage.
A better space to occupy is one shared by folks who are acting in good faith.
I don't wish to discuss anything with someone that talks in memes. You're using it to avoid discussion. What specifically is not truthful in the video?
> I don't wish to discuss anything with someone that talks in memes. [ed: yet, you next indicate otherwise by asking] What specifically is not truthful in the video?
You are being inconsistent in your expressions here. This makes this conversation a matter of guesswork.
Will you take seriously, the evidence that the video creator has a long history of bad faith? If so, why keep trying to advance his video? If not, then that is where this discussion is.
The larger story is everywhere:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDWWDyckVxk
This hit the news a few weeks ago. Nick's coverage is a specific branch that has not been covered yet.
I also asked you early on in our discussion which journalist you would trust, and you did not answer. I like Nick Shirley, and I don't think he does bad faith reporting. If that sentence makes you want to leave the conversation, then congrats, just another leftist that does not want to engage on the arguments. I answered your question, now you answer mine.
5 replies →