Comment by AndyNemmity
15 hours ago
The funny part is, the vast majority of them are barely doing anything at all.
All of these systems are for managing context.
You can generally tell which ones are actually doing something if they are using skills, with programs in them.
Because then, you're actually attaching some sort of feature to the system.
Otherwise, you're just feeding in different prompts and steps, which can add some value, but okay, it doesn't take much to do that.
Like adding image generation to claude code with google nano banana, a python script that does it.
That's actually adding something claude code doesn't have, instead of just saying "You are an expert in blah"
It sounds like you've used quite a few. What programs are you expecting? Assuming you're talking about doing some inference on the data? Or optimizing for some RAG or something?
An example of a skill i gave, adding image generation to nano banana.
another is one claude code ships with, using rip grep.
Those are actual features. It's adding deterministic programs that the llm calls when it needs something.
Oh got it - tool use
1 reply →
> You can generally tell which ones are actually doing something if they are using skills, with programs in them.
> Otherwise, you're just feeding in different prompts and steps
"skills" are literally just .md files with different prompts and steps.
> That's actually adding something claude code doesn't have, instead of just saying "You are an expert in blah"
It's not adding anything but a prompt saying "when asked to do X invoke script Y or do steps Z"
Skill are md files, but they are not just that. They are also scripts. That's what adding things are. You can make a skill that is just a prompt, but that misses the point of the value.
You're packaging the tool with the skill, or multiple tools to do a single thing.