Comment by F3nd0 1 month ago The ongoing non-adoption of Esperanto remains one of the world's many tragedies. 2 comments F3nd0 Reply nephihaha 1 month ago Yes and no. Esperanto has strengths and weaknesses, and some see it as Eurocentric, but let's just leave it at that. F3nd0 1 month ago Every language has strengths and weaknesses. Perfect is the enemy of good. If your definition of 'good' is 'relatively easy and technically international', Esperanto is very suitable. (Not to mention way better than the status quo, in any case.)
nephihaha 1 month ago Yes and no. Esperanto has strengths and weaknesses, and some see it as Eurocentric, but let's just leave it at that. F3nd0 1 month ago Every language has strengths and weaknesses. Perfect is the enemy of good. If your definition of 'good' is 'relatively easy and technically international', Esperanto is very suitable. (Not to mention way better than the status quo, in any case.)
F3nd0 1 month ago Every language has strengths and weaknesses. Perfect is the enemy of good. If your definition of 'good' is 'relatively easy and technically international', Esperanto is very suitable. (Not to mention way better than the status quo, in any case.)
Yes and no. Esperanto has strengths and weaknesses, and some see it as Eurocentric, but let's just leave it at that.
Every language has strengths and weaknesses. Perfect is the enemy of good. If your definition of 'good' is 'relatively easy and technically international', Esperanto is very suitable. (Not to mention way better than the status quo, in any case.)