Comment by stefan_ 1 month ago So that they can pay 100x more expenses for.. no gain? They would pay an arm just for traffic. 8 comments stefan_ Reply kevin_thibedeau 1 month ago It's OpEx. MBAs will pour unlimited money into OpEx to avoid CapEx. somehnguy 1 month ago Clearly I don't have an MBA because this mindset doesn't make sense to me. Burning money unnecessarily is burning money unnecessarily, no matter where it's burned. arcfour 1 month ago CloudFlare is free/cheap and hey presto, no servers to manage! herewulf 1 month ago And when your Cloudflare site is down, most of the Internet is down too! There's no downside! arcfour 1 month ago That's true. It will be down much less often than a single server in someone's basement. encrypted_bird 1 month ago Counterpoint: that would require using CloudFlare. arcfour 1 month ago That is, in my opinion, far superior to using a single server ran by "someone". 1 reply →
kevin_thibedeau 1 month ago It's OpEx. MBAs will pour unlimited money into OpEx to avoid CapEx. somehnguy 1 month ago Clearly I don't have an MBA because this mindset doesn't make sense to me. Burning money unnecessarily is burning money unnecessarily, no matter where it's burned.
somehnguy 1 month ago Clearly I don't have an MBA because this mindset doesn't make sense to me. Burning money unnecessarily is burning money unnecessarily, no matter where it's burned.
arcfour 1 month ago CloudFlare is free/cheap and hey presto, no servers to manage! herewulf 1 month ago And when your Cloudflare site is down, most of the Internet is down too! There's no downside! arcfour 1 month ago That's true. It will be down much less often than a single server in someone's basement. encrypted_bird 1 month ago Counterpoint: that would require using CloudFlare. arcfour 1 month ago That is, in my opinion, far superior to using a single server ran by "someone". 1 reply →
herewulf 1 month ago And when your Cloudflare site is down, most of the Internet is down too! There's no downside! arcfour 1 month ago That's true. It will be down much less often than a single server in someone's basement.
arcfour 1 month ago That's true. It will be down much less often than a single server in someone's basement.
encrypted_bird 1 month ago Counterpoint: that would require using CloudFlare. arcfour 1 month ago That is, in my opinion, far superior to using a single server ran by "someone". 1 reply →
arcfour 1 month ago That is, in my opinion, far superior to using a single server ran by "someone". 1 reply →
It's OpEx. MBAs will pour unlimited money into OpEx to avoid CapEx.
Clearly I don't have an MBA because this mindset doesn't make sense to me. Burning money unnecessarily is burning money unnecessarily, no matter where it's burned.
CloudFlare is free/cheap and hey presto, no servers to manage!
And when your Cloudflare site is down, most of the Internet is down too! There's no downside!
That's true. It will be down much less often than a single server in someone's basement.
Counterpoint: that would require using CloudFlare.
That is, in my opinion, far superior to using a single server ran by "someone".
1 reply →