Comment by amelius 8 hours ago Honestly, can't we just ditch BT and send audio over WiFi?One thing less to worry about. 5 comments amelius Reply cloudfudge 3 hours ago "Just use wifi for headphones"and"One less thing to worry about"These are not compatible statements. :) wolvoleo 5 hours ago WiFi is nowhere near as low energy as Bluetooth is. michaelt 6 hours ago If you think wireless headphones are insecure today, I very much doubt connecting them directly to the internet would improve the situation. theteapot 4 hours ago AFAIK Wifi Direct has quite wide hardware support -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct. But few people know about it? amelius 6 hours ago WiFi does not necessarily mean it's connected to the internet.
cloudfudge 3 hours ago "Just use wifi for headphones"and"One less thing to worry about"These are not compatible statements. :)
michaelt 6 hours ago If you think wireless headphones are insecure today, I very much doubt connecting them directly to the internet would improve the situation. theteapot 4 hours ago AFAIK Wifi Direct has quite wide hardware support -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct. But few people know about it? amelius 6 hours ago WiFi does not necessarily mean it's connected to the internet.
theteapot 4 hours ago AFAIK Wifi Direct has quite wide hardware support -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct. But few people know about it?
"Just use wifi for headphones"
and
"One less thing to worry about"
These are not compatible statements. :)
WiFi is nowhere near as low energy as Bluetooth is.
If you think wireless headphones are insecure today, I very much doubt connecting them directly to the internet would improve the situation.
AFAIK Wifi Direct has quite wide hardware support -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct. But few people know about it?
WiFi does not necessarily mean it's connected to the internet.