Comment by tomtomtom777

1 month ago

I think integration into jq would be both powerful and sufficient.

Powerful but not sufficient. There’s plenty of us who don’t use jq for various reasons.

  • LLMs have allowed me to start using jq for more than pretty printing JSON.

    • The issue isn’t jq’s syntax. It’s that I already use other tools that fill that niche and have done since as long as jq has been a thing. And frankly, I personally believe the other tools are superior so I don’t want to fallback to jq just because someone on HN tells me to.