← Back to context Comment by tomtomtom777 8 hours ago I think integration into jq would be both powerful and sufficient. 3 comments tomtomtom777 Reply hnlmorg 7 hours ago Powerful but not sufficient. There’s plenty of us who don’t use jq for various reasons. jcims 6 hours ago LLMs have allowed me to start using jq for more than pretty printing JSON. ruuda 36 minutes ago Give https://rcl-lang.org/#intuitive-json-queries a try! It can fill a similar role, but the syntax is very similar to Python/TypeScript/Rust, so you don’t need an LLM to write the query for you.
hnlmorg 7 hours ago Powerful but not sufficient. There’s plenty of us who don’t use jq for various reasons. jcims 6 hours ago LLMs have allowed me to start using jq for more than pretty printing JSON. ruuda 36 minutes ago Give https://rcl-lang.org/#intuitive-json-queries a try! It can fill a similar role, but the syntax is very similar to Python/TypeScript/Rust, so you don’t need an LLM to write the query for you.
jcims 6 hours ago LLMs have allowed me to start using jq for more than pretty printing JSON. ruuda 36 minutes ago Give https://rcl-lang.org/#intuitive-json-queries a try! It can fill a similar role, but the syntax is very similar to Python/TypeScript/Rust, so you don’t need an LLM to write the query for you.
ruuda 36 minutes ago Give https://rcl-lang.org/#intuitive-json-queries a try! It can fill a similar role, but the syntax is very similar to Python/TypeScript/Rust, so you don’t need an LLM to write the query for you.
Powerful but not sufficient. There’s plenty of us who don’t use jq for various reasons.
LLMs have allowed me to start using jq for more than pretty printing JSON.
Give https://rcl-lang.org/#intuitive-json-queries a try! It can fill a similar role, but the syntax is very similar to Python/TypeScript/Rust, so you don’t need an LLM to write the query for you.