Comment by croes

6 days ago

To hinder China, so sell it themselves, to prevent competition

Don’t forget I mentioned other resources too. Venezuela has more than oil.

Can you guess what resource the US is trying to procure by this military action?

I think you are trying to force an incorrect simplistic narrative on the situation. Obtaining natural resources is not an important motivation for US military action with the possible exception of US intervention in the Persian Gulf during the Cold War (and even there I see no evidence that the US was trying to get out of paying the going international rate for the oil as opposed to merely ensuring that willing sellers in the Gulf could continue to transport their oil over the ocean). Venezuela's cooperation with Moscow and Beijing is a much more likely motivation, i.e., US national security.

  • > Venezuela's cooperation with Moscow and Beijing is a much more likely motivation, i.e., US national security.

    If that’s the case why pootin got a red carpet in Alaska instead of orange jumpsuit?

    Why if ruzzia is such a “threat to national security”, current government of “no new wars” doesn’t help Ukraine?

    Don’t forget that eliminating (or reducing its influence to nothing) ruzzia - would hurt China immensely. Two birds with one stone and all… also with a benefit of a true legitimacy of helping Ukraine and destroying ruzzian totalitarianism.

  • Can you tell me why Vance and others speak of stolen oil?

    What oil was stolen? Whose oil was stolen?