Comment by latexr 5 months ago And everything is “fact checked” by the Grok LLM. Which… Yeah…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)#Controversies 1 comment latexr Reply __patchbit__ 5 months ago The Grok information source is more reliable than Wikipedia.Objectively and incrementally improving. The leadership behind Grok is human rated safe rocket science quality.Whereas Wikipedia is a fugly dumpsterdive.
__patchbit__ 5 months ago The Grok information source is more reliable than Wikipedia.Objectively and incrementally improving. The leadership behind Grok is human rated safe rocket science quality.Whereas Wikipedia is a fugly dumpsterdive.
The Grok information source is more reliable than Wikipedia.
Objectively and incrementally improving. The leadership behind Grok is human rated safe rocket science quality.
Whereas Wikipedia is a fugly dumpsterdive.