Comment by elliotbnvl 1 month ago Why is the head chef called the head chef, then? He doesn’t “cook”. 5 comments elliotbnvl Reply 9rx 1 month ago To differentiate him from the "cook", which is what we call those who carry out the actual act of cooking. elliotbnvl 1 month ago Well, don’t go around calling me a compiler! 9rx 1 month ago If that's what you do, then the name is perfectly apt. Why shy away from what you are? beaker52 1 month ago The difference is that the head chef can cook very well and could do a better job of the dish than the trainee. krapp 1 month ago "head chef" is a managerial position but yes often they can and do cook.
9rx 1 month ago To differentiate him from the "cook", which is what we call those who carry out the actual act of cooking. elliotbnvl 1 month ago Well, don’t go around calling me a compiler! 9rx 1 month ago If that's what you do, then the name is perfectly apt. Why shy away from what you are?
elliotbnvl 1 month ago Well, don’t go around calling me a compiler! 9rx 1 month ago If that's what you do, then the name is perfectly apt. Why shy away from what you are?
9rx 1 month ago If that's what you do, then the name is perfectly apt. Why shy away from what you are?
beaker52 1 month ago The difference is that the head chef can cook very well and could do a better job of the dish than the trainee.
To differentiate him from the "cook", which is what we call those who carry out the actual act of cooking.
Well, don’t go around calling me a compiler!
If that's what you do, then the name is perfectly apt. Why shy away from what you are?
The difference is that the head chef can cook very well and could do a better job of the dish than the trainee.
"head chef" is a managerial position but yes often they can and do cook.