Comment by anthonypasq

17 days ago

a response like this is confusing to me. what you are saying makes sense, but seems irrelevant. something like gas town is clearly not attempting to be a production grade tool. its an opinionated glimpse into the future. i think the astethic was fitting and intentional.

this is the equivalent of some crazy inventor in the 19th century strapping a steam engine onto a unicycle and telling you that some day youll be able to go 100mph on a bike. He was right in the end, but no one is actually going to build something usable with current technology.

Opus 4.5 isnt there. But will there be a model in 3-5 years thats smart enough, fast enough, and cheap enough for a refined vision of this to be possible? Im going to bet on yes to that question.

I think this read is generous:

> something like gas town is clearly not attempting to be a production grade tool.

Compare to the first two sentences:

> Gas Town is a new take on the IDE for 2026. Gas Town helps you with the tedium of running lots of Claude Code instances. Stuff gets lost, it’s hard to track who’s doing what, etc. Gas Town helps with all that yak shaving, and lets you focus on what your Claude Codes are working on.

Compared to your read, my read is confused: is it or is it not intending to be a useful tool (we can debate "production" quality, here I'm just thinking something I'd actually use meaningfully -- like Claude Code)?

I think the author wants us to take this post seriously, so I'm taking it seriously, and my critique in the original post was a serious reaction.

  • The blog post says, many times, not to use Gastown. It makes fun of the tool's inconsistent branding and describes a lot of jankiness.

    This tool is dangerous, largely untested, and yet may be of interest if you are already doing similar things in production.

in 3-5years, sure, just like we are all currently using crypto to pay for groceries and smart contracts for all legal matters.