← Back to context Comment by krageon 2 months ago He fired a shitload of people, of course we can criticise him 6 comments krageon Reply Griffinsauce 2 months ago Three. He fired three people.Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale. lionkor 2 months ago He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that. 306bobby 2 months ago [flagged] 2 replies → stavros 2 months ago I'm also criticizing you for not hiring the laid-off people at their former salary.
Griffinsauce 2 months ago Three. He fired three people.Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale. lionkor 2 months ago He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that. 306bobby 2 months ago [flagged] 2 replies →
lionkor 2 months ago He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that. 306bobby 2 months ago [flagged] 2 replies →
stavros 2 months ago I'm also criticizing you for not hiring the laid-off people at their former salary.
Three. He fired three people.
Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale.
He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that.
[flagged]
2 replies →
I'm also criticizing you for not hiring the laid-off people at their former salary.