← Back to context Comment by krageon 1 day ago He fired a shitload of people, of course we can criticise him 6 comments krageon Reply Griffinsauce 1 day ago Three. He fired three people.Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale. lionkor 1 day ago He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that. 306bobby 1 day ago [flagged] 2 replies → stavros 1 day ago I'm also criticizing you for not hiring the laid-off people at their former salary.
Griffinsauce 1 day ago Three. He fired three people.Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale. lionkor 1 day ago He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that. 306bobby 1 day ago [flagged] 2 replies →
lionkor 1 day ago He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that. 306bobby 1 day ago [flagged] 2 replies →
stavros 1 day ago I'm also criticizing you for not hiring the laid-off people at their former salary.
Three. He fired three people.
Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale.
He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that.
[flagged]
2 replies →
I'm also criticizing you for not hiring the laid-off people at their former salary.