Comment by nxobject 1 month ago And what are the chances of a smaller vendor being any more secure? 4 comments nxobject Reply ryan_n 1 month ago Them being more secure would be good, but it's still mass surveillance of citizens without much justification. notyourwork 1 month ago Decentralized surveillance. Only mass if it’s all cohesively accessible by one entity. cowsandmilk 1 month ago Which is definitely the case for flock and likely for other companies. fn-mote 1 month ago With a bar this low? Pretty good.
ryan_n 1 month ago Them being more secure would be good, but it's still mass surveillance of citizens without much justification. notyourwork 1 month ago Decentralized surveillance. Only mass if it’s all cohesively accessible by one entity. cowsandmilk 1 month ago Which is definitely the case for flock and likely for other companies.
notyourwork 1 month ago Decentralized surveillance. Only mass if it’s all cohesively accessible by one entity. cowsandmilk 1 month ago Which is definitely the case for flock and likely for other companies.
Them being more secure would be good, but it's still mass surveillance of citizens without much justification.
Decentralized surveillance. Only mass if it’s all cohesively accessible by one entity.
Which is definitely the case for flock and likely for other companies.
With a bar this low? Pretty good.