← Back to context

Comment by starkeeper

1 day ago

This is so messed up harvesting the eye from a creature that lives hundreds of years. I guess they put the shark down. RIP one eye.

I would agree, but then I read the Wikipedia page which says that around 10 of these animals are caught every day as bycatch, so I assume the shark that was studied came from one of these.

This shark takes 150 years to reach sexual maturity and gestates for 8-18 years. It's pretty fucked up that bycatch at this rate is just accepted because it surely is going to lead the species to extinction. Humans are pretty fucking arrogant.

If these sharks were not caught at this rate then I would agree that they shouldn't be studied in ways that require killing them, but since they are, I think it is better to at least get some knowledge out of it and possibly raise awareness of the problem.

Edit: read the article, and it actually says it was caught by the scientists and not as bycatch. Still, this catch is negligible compared to the 3500 that are caught, killed and thrown out again (I assume) each year

  • People don't want to face the music but the way we're fishing is completely unsustainable.

    The way we live on land is unsustainable too, of course.

    • There's a massive reduction in the whale song of the blue whales. Almost halved. They are presumably starving.

      That something ginormous can be so elegant, beautiful and sleek is hard to conceive till one meets a blue whale. Let's let them thrive on the blue planet.

      2 replies →

    • We keep talking about “sustainability” but sustainability is a secondary issue here.

      The primary issue is that we are taking individuals and basically torturing and/or killing them, rarely for good reasons.

      It won’t even be decades before our descendants look back at horror for how we treat them, not unlike how we can’t even imagine how our ancestors thought it was ok to have human slaves.

      The major difference will be that the horrors of human chattel slavery (even the name clearly links it to how we treat non human animals) have largely only been recorded via text. The horrors of our actions will be available in text, images, videos for all to see in perpetuity by just looking at an Instagram archive.

  • jeez 8-18 years, is that a record or is it one of those things they don't know enough about them to narrow down? that's another thing to think about when my ignorant self is eating my sushi. i used to assume that farmed salmon was marginally better than wild, but given how much wild fish gets fed to farmed fish, not sure that is even a plus on top of the ecological effects of fish farming.

  • > The Greenland sharks used in her co-study were caught between 2020 and 2024 using scientific long lines off the coast of the University of Copenhagen's Arctic Station on Disko Island, Greenland.

    But I guess a few sharks for scientific sampling are probably still negligible compared to bycatch.

  • Douglas Adams had Last Chance To See and then the series got a reboot by Stephen Fry

is future possible cure for humans worth one shark eye?

how many fish, water mammals and may be humans shark killed for hundred years? did shark thought about their eyes?*

*except in sence that eyeballs are very delicios

  • Greenland sharks don't kill humans, they're not more "responsible" for what white sharks do than you as a mammal are responsible for tigers killing their prey.