Comment by haasiy
1 month ago
I have to stand my ground here. Reducing a complex functionality into 15KB is not just about 'generating code'—it's about an architecture that AI cannot conceive on its own.
My role was to architect the bridge between UI/UX design and the underlying video data processing. Handling frame extraction via Canvas, managing memory, and ensuring a seamless seek experience without any backend support requires a deep understanding of how these layers interact.
Simply connecting a backend to a UI might be common, but eliminating the backend entirely while maintaining the utility is a high-level engineering choice. AI was my hammer, but I was the one who designed the bridge. To say this is worth no more than its token count ignores the most difficult part: the intent and the structural simplification that makes it usable for others in a single line of code.
> Reducing a complex functionality into 15KB is not just about 'generating code'—it's about an architecture that AI cannot conceive on its own.
Ironic.
The discussion here has been helpful for technical nuance. For those interested in the practical adoption and impact, a startup outlet covered the project's approach and real-world use-case for SaaS platforms here: https://ecosistemastartup.com/vam-seek-navegacion-visual-2d-...
Bad bot.
1 reply →
なるほど、そこを引き合いに出すということはオレの反論に返す言葉が無いってことか? Aiの言葉がトークンがコードが、どうこう言うからあえて母語で伝えてやるよ。 しょうもないクレームにAIを使うのは今や世界標準だぜ?皮肉にもw